> We may also remove media that we deem has been manipulated in a way that misleads, such as:

The two examples are about misleading provenance. Is this section supposed to be more general than that?

I kinda think the political content policy needs to be more specific than "extremist" (is Extinction Rebellion an extremist group?), and I don't think the "misleading information" policy says what you intend it to at all. It's obvious what you intend it to mean, but… well, nobody's made a massive screaming derail about "disproven" yet (to my surprise), so maybe "it's obvious what you intend" is enough.

@wizzwizz4 I don't think you could/should explicitly lay out every possible situation

You're right. Things can be addressed if and when they come up.

It's not like I've got a better way to word it. 🤷