« first day (135 days earlier)      last day (125 days later) » 

6:30 PM
> Hey Everyone,

We've been talking with CMs about this, and a bit more amongst ourselves, and we've come up with the following plan:

We'll unfreeze this room, so you can talk and test your bots here again.
We won't, however, reinstate room owners. I will appoint myself as owner of this room, to avoid the system automatically appointing one.
If you feel like something in this room is inappropriate, raise a moderator flag.
You're welcome to continue chatting here, but I'd like everyone to consider the part of the CoC that says 'be careful with jokes'.
6
 
Tinkeringbell has unfrozen this room.
 
Tinkeringbell has stopped a feed from being posted into this room
Tinkeringbell has stopped a feed from being posted into this room
 
7:07 PM
@Tinkeringbell Thanks so much!
 
7:29 PM
Tada!!
 
@TechBOT OH
 
@TechExpertWizard Whispered
 
@Tec heh
 
@TechExpertWizard Dat
 
@TechBOT dis
 
7:31 PM
@TechExpertWizard Campo
 
@TechBOT camping
 
@TechExpertWizard Scout
 
@Tin I'd like to ask you a question. What if a bot inadvertently spews bad words? I mean, I always try to make sure my bot filters out bad words when it does WAG, but what if a bad word leaked through the filter? Will the bot get chatbanned? Will the bot owner get chatbanned?
 
7:44 PM
Depends. There's some precedence for temporary banning bots if the owner isn't around to fix them, otherwise it depends on whether we suspect the bot was instructed to do this deliberately or not.
 
@Tin okay, thanks! I'll probably be around here most of the time tho.
 
8:10 PM
Bye, @Tec!
Welcome, @Tec!
 
8:25 PM
hmm...
now, what was that WAG problem?
oh yeah, that...
 
Welcome, @Vic!
Welcome, @Bot!
 
8:41 PM
vsb alive
 
Bot
Ya really doubt me huh?
 
vsb alive
 
Bot
Y'really doubt me huh?
 
vsb js log("hey back")
uhhh
its another version ig
 
@VictorVosMottor huh?
 
8:43 PM
@TechExpertWizard Git
 
@VictorVosMottor I think you ran wrong version 👌
 
@TechExpertWizard Beg
 
@Vic but hey, strange, my own instance of the bot should be able to do it
 
Bot
hey back
 
vsb alive
 
8:44 PM
@TechBOT IT IS NOT A BAD WORD BECAUSE SAYING IT IS BAD IS LIKE SAYING SVN IS A BAD WORD
 
@VictorVosMottor Expedient
 
Bot
Y'really doubt me huh?
 
@Bot oh it's too slow 👌
 
@TechExpertWizard Reply
 
@Vic wdym?
 
8:44 PM
> git
 
@VictorVosMottor Gnu
 
@Vic so what?
 
@TechBOT Linuxoid bot, truly linuxoid
 
:8873246
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: bound must be positive
at java.base/java.util.Random.nextInt(Random.java:388)
at Bot$1.accept(Bot.java:89)
at Bot$1.accept(Bot.java:30)
at org.sobotics.chatexchange.chat.Room.lambda$null$6(Room.java:231)
at java.base/java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:515)
at java.base/java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:264)
at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1130)
at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:630)
 
@Vic LMAO
@Tec uh-oh
 
8:45 PM
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: bound must be positive
at java.base/java.util.Random.nextInt(Random.java:388)
at Bot.lambda$main$2(Bot.java:103)
at org.sobotics.chatexchange.chat.Room.lambda$null$6(Room.java:231)
at java.base/java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:515)
at java.base/java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:264)
at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1130)
at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:630)
 
@Tec stappit
 
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: bound must be positive
at java.base/java.util.Random.nextInt(Random.java:388)
at Bot.lambda$main$2(Bot.java:103)
at org.sobotics.chatexchange.chat.Room.lambda$null$6(Room.java:231)
at java.base/java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:515)
at java.base/java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:264)
at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1130)
at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:630)
 
@TechExpertWizard so nothing
 
@VictorVosMottor Pitiful
 
@Tec c'mon man
 
8:45 PM
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: bound must be positive
at java.base/java.util.Random.nextInt(Random.java:388)
at Bot.lambda$main$2(Bot.java:103)
at org.sobotics.chatexchange.chat.Room.lambda$null$6(Room.java:231)
at java.base/java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:515)
at java.base/java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:264)
at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1130)
at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:630)
 
@Vic Please don't send offensive messages.
 
@TechExpertWizard uhhh?
 
:8873260
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: bound must be positive
at java.base/java.util.Random.nextInt(Random.java:388)
at Bot$1.accept(Bot.java:89)
at Bot$1.accept(Bot.java:30)
at org.sobotics.chatexchange.chat.Room.lambda$null$6(Room.java:231)
at java.base/java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:515)
at java.base/java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:264)
at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1130)
at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:630)
 
@Vic That's a rule that you should follow...
 
9:05 PM
Bye, @Vic!
Welcome, @Vic!
 
hi back
 
@Vic great!
 
9:20 PM
Bye, @Vic!
Welcome, @10R!
Bye, @10R!
Welcome, @10R!
Bye, @10R!
Bye, @Tin!
Bye, @Bot!
 
10:07 PM
Welcome, @Lor!
Bye, @Tec!
 
10:28 PM
Welcome, @Tec!
 

« first day (135 days earlier)      last day (125 days later) »