@peterh Actually, @NicolBolas is very relevant in mod matters. As are many of the community. That's the point.

@RoryAlsop He is not a member of the SE mod team.

@RoryAlsop I am still waiting some content in your unreasoned, empty critics yesterday

@RoryAlsop Btw, he has the tendency to use not very nice arguments. For example, to pick a small part of my content, and then talking only about it, not from the whole. And somehow these are nearly always ad hominem talks. Well, that insult was really an over-reaction, but I still would not say that he would be good.

@peterh He, like many others, is a member of the moderating community, as are many high rep folks

@peterh I'm not going to bother - you can go back over various transcripts. I know you are actively forgetting them.

@peterh I see the opposite - his comments are very positive and aiming to inform and guide you, as you still seem very misguided about SE

@RoryAlsop I don't understand you, really

You are a single mod with who I can have a nearly fair contact.

I can talk to you!

You can't imagine, what worth it has with an ordinary mortal!

However, about Nicol Bolas. I think the reason, why I think he is evil, and you don't, is that our world-view, what is evil significantly differ. For example, if X writes a post/comment, with a list of arguments in it. Y then picks one of the arguments (with a real mistake), and talk only about this, ignoring the others, and also includes in his "critics", how bad is X.

In my opinion, Y does evil.

On your, and Nicol Bolas' opnion, I think, probably not.

From the other side: I think, in your - and maybe his - opinion, opebnly challenging and criticizing a community consent is already a bad thing. At least it requires a strong reason. In my world-view, it is a signature of the freedom of speech/thinking.

Thus, you might consider my behavior bad. Maybe even evil.

In my opinion, I only use the freedom what the SE itself grants me, for goals I consider useful.

@RoryAlsop Thus, our difference in our opinions, root in a large part in that, what do we consider evil. It is a serious phylosophical difference.