None of them are nuisance. I believe every one of them.
Oh you mean comments.
None of them are particularly negative. If your site attracts users who defensively insist that things like "How do I clean my bathroom without cleaning it" are good questions for the site, that's not my fault. You're consistently ignoring awful content to artificially inflate the beta stats for your site. You should be ashamed.
The existence of that site is a disservice to humanity, and the constant discouragement of good well-established answers that aren't "hacky" enough counters SE's entire purpose as a credible source of good information.
It's all the junk that nobody could think of to put anywhere else.
And I'm assuming the "negative" comments that @Mooseman is referring are things like
Down voted due to lack of research and clarity (we don't even know what kind of roaches they are). Flagged to close as not needing a lifehack, since it has not been made clear why other standard pest control methods (even e.g. calling an exterminator) beyond one arbitrary brand of roach bait are not acceptable. Pest control is a well-studied problem and non-hack resources exist to solve it. "Hacks" here are likely to just be less-than-useful "tips" ultimately resulting in proper pest control methods anyways. — Jason C3 hours ago
The comments aren't negative, the content being commented on just has nothing positive about it. At least I'm actually explaining myself.
In any case it's still an awful question. The site just needs a canonical "How do I dry things?" "Use high airflow, heat, or rice" to mark all these as duplicates of.
@cybermonkey Good. Then they don't deserve to have a phone.
@cybermonkey Besides you could say that about any of the actual answers on the site. For example, there's always going to be some idiot that believes that a light trail of peppermint oil around a house will cure their ant problem, then they're going to try it.
But of course, a suggestion to not leave food out, use actual pesticides, or call an exterminator would not be well-received, because @Mooseman et. al have to keep the site quality high by actively fending off things that actually make sense.
I dislike that user, they rejected my edit that removed the swearing and fixes a couple of other issues, only to submit their own edit. I re-submitted the edit and they rejected it again.
Every time I do the dishes by hand, I scald my hands, but if I use cold water, the dishes don't get clean. This is extremely inconvenient, especially when I need to clean them fast, rather than soaking them. Is there another way to clean my dishes?
> Only members of The Stack Exchange Network with at least 20 reputation may talk here – but all the conversations are free, open, and public to read by anyone.
It lies!
> If your chat messages are repeatedly being flagged by your peers you might find yourself muted, banned, or – in extreme cases – your The Stack Exchange Network reputation may be negatively affected.
Every time I do the dishes by hand, I scald my hands, but if I use cold water, the dishes don't get clean. This is extremely inconvenient, especially when I need to clean them fast, rather than soaking them. Is there another way to clean my dishes?
