I considered the possibility that the OP doesn't understand how down voting works on Meta and assumes that because his original post was down voted people are out to sabotage him, but I'm not sure...

@drachenstern That was my thinking when I did it, but apparently I broke the whole conspiracy wide open

I've got the Watergate tapes too, but I'm waiting for the right time

@MichaelMrozek Don't worry, we won't tell @RebeccaChernoff

Repro?

Hey speaking of rigged contests and @RebeccaChernoff ... did she "win" the Gemini Croquets contest or something

@TimStone link?

Oh, whoops.

meta.stackoverflow.com/posts/73812/revisions

no, the revisions page looks fine on Chrome here on XP

Fine on IE8/Win7

Hm, yes...appears to be a Firefox issue.

repro on FX3.6.13/XP

adding #revisions { clear:both;} resolves the issue I believe.

Does that resolve for you too @TimStone?

What the hell...

Yeah, it does.

@TimStone what precisely?

But I am very confused why the header link is floated to the left. :P

idk

@Jin can you answer?

crash-stats.mozilla.com/products/Firefox

@drachenstern say what now?

Do you recognize the term "Gemini Croquettes"?

DON'T ANSWER THAT QUESTION!

If not the rest is a bad joke that you won't get, if so, it's just a bad joke

@TimStone:

Oh. I thought this was an interrogation.

@balpha You're my hero! <3

@drachenstern I'd be ashamed to publish that :P

@MichaelMyers lol

I wonder if she got the joke then, since she was quiet ... Also, what, is she in lockdown training today? ;)

@drachenstern can you post that bug on meta?

Firefox = new IE6

@Jin It sounds like balpha already fixed it

@MichaelMyers great. I love it when I don't have to do anything...

@TimStone Hello, hello!

Oh no, not again!

Poor @MichaelMyers

@PopularDemand How's uh...stuff?

I. AM. NOT. MICHAEL MROZEK.

@MichaelMyers why not? :p

Don't insult Myers like that. q:

@PopularDemand ohaithere

@TimStone [insert Judd Hirsch Family Guy clip]

@drachenstern Ah, I guess that chart is really skewed by extension developers.

@TimStone most likely, I have no clue

Well, if you look at the top crashers, which apparently is somehow worth noting...

@drachenstern Hello, hello.

Oh, well rather I guess by the plugins themselves, it seems that it's showing the causes (my bad).

Oh Skype toolbar and your crashing Firefox 38 thousand times..

@PopularDemand Ah, very good then :P

@Jin that bug is fixed (it wasn't really a css issue); see the meta super user question I linked

@TimStone and this surprises you in some way?

@drachenstern No, not really.

@TimStone (That assumes that nothing's up with you; feel free to correct me if I'm wrong.)

No, that sounds about accurate.

@Rebecca now that you are part of the inner circle, you are going to supply us with additional downvotes for our downvoting ring.

bwahahahaha

Hi all

Hi Moshe

Too bad the idea I had during lunch was taken

This is an odd evening on chat.meta

@Pekka - Evening?

Everybody's present, but nobody's saying anything

Okay, well, I'll talk.

Where the clocks go right, It's evening.

I just got back from lunch with a friend.

Everywhere else, the clocks are WRONG

@Pekka Awaits incoming paypal deposits. (;

heh

@Pekka I'm trying to figure out why this JVM keeps tanking. :P

@Rebecca incoming paypal deposits? I'm all ears

At lunch I thought of a great idea - a mail service that is made for throwaway emails.

Aww, who made the starred list header large?

@drachenstern You've been rather harsh on meta today :)

But....

/blame @rchern

@TimStone heh

it exists.

@MichaelMrozek I'm always harsh on meta. Have you seen my new avi?

idk why tho, I generally like most of the people there, I just think they don't have any capacity to think for five seconds into the future ... ** some people that is

@RebeccaChernoff Ah, you mean that kind of incoming deposits. Like, incoming on your account. (Slightly disappointed)

@MichaelMrozek also, I want to redecorate his living room now. I'm inspired. I'm going to put it outside by the grill.

@drachenstern - I'd like to see this post... :-D

<-Learned how to use github today.

Git 'er done!

@RebeccaChernoff but your wish is my command.

@MichaelMyers heh

@Moshe nice!

Oops, did I leave my bad-joke bot running again?

@Pekka lol

@drachenstern .2 what? I don't understand

@MichaelMyers - Well, now that @RebeccaChernoff is capable, she can move it to the Bad Joke Room.

@Pekka the edit history ;)

@drachenstern - I didn't exactly get everything, but I made my script appear on github.

@Moshe Not yet. Her name isn't blue yet.

@Moshe ah, with time comes practice comes experience comes success ;)

@MichaelMyers O

@drachenstern - Yep

@drachenstern ah! I see. Then I have to up my bribe

@MichaelPetrotta It's OK, I'm sure you can bribe us.

If I can brush up on Javascript, I'll have something less embarrassing to show.

I'm actually pretty careful about what I say in public forums. In a different state of mind, I wouldn't have posted that, even if I'd have no problem with someone else doing it.

It's a stupid word to use in that way, and I always want to call it out.

It really is, yes.

Let's blame that OP for everything!

@TimStone or we could spin the WoB

We could, but.

@MichaelMrozek how exactly does one farm rep? I'm so interested in knowing now that you said that meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/73758/…

@drachenstern It's easy; you join our secret vote ring, and then we give you upvotes all day long

@MichaelMrozek ooooooh :p

I just meant if your main goal is accumulating rep instead of answering questions

Naturally you'll focus on easy questions then

@drachenstern One part sunlight, one part water, two parts love.

Referring to Evan Carroll's guide?

@MichaelMrozek: shhh. We're being watched...

If your focus is answering questions, his question made no sense

@MichaelMrozek Some of us can only focus on easy questions...

Hello

@JesseHartwick That's fine, but that meta question was asking what questions you should answer. Obviously you should answer the questions you know the answer to, unless your goal is to accumulate rep, in which case you might want to be more selective (e.g. don't bother answering an old question on an unpopular tag, since it probably won't get many upvotes)

If your goal is to accumulate rep, you should answer every question you know the answer to. There's no cap on answers.

If your goal is to have a high votes-per-post ratio, then you would focus on easy questions.

@MichaelMyers Not if it's an answer that won't get upvotes, then you might as well spend that time answering other more popular questions

Unless you're hitting the rep cap every day and have time to spare, but if you are you're probably not posting on meta about which questions you should answer

I wish you could star parts of a message. Then we could come up with some really interesting sidebar content...

@MichaelMrozek If you're time-constrained, yes.

I tend to answer questions I think I would like to answer. What does that mean about me?

Still working on my userscript

I also tend to comment with the correct cornerstone of an answer far more often than I actually answer, it would seem :|

@MichaelMyers Is that still available somewhere?

Next to Mein Kampf and the Satanic Bible, I assume